- » Learning from the NIU tragedy
- » ocal psychiatrist: Isolation was a factor
- » NIU holds vigil on shooting anniversary
- » NIU plans vigil on shootings anniversary
- » NIU shooting site to be renovated
- » NIU chief cleared of wrongdoing
- » Report: NIU cop chief made threat
- » NIU: A day of sadness, support and hope
- » NIU Remembers: A Day of Reflection
- » What you can do
- » NIU security measures go undercover
- » NIU shooting victim memorialized with tree
- » NIU, Va. Tech learn how to bounce back
- » NIU students go back at school, reflect
- » NIU president pleased with new safety law
- More Related Stories
Why did a shooter pick Northern Illinois University for his deadly rampage in 2008?
It could be because he was angry at his surrogate university family, speculates a report released Thursday by NIU.
The reason behind the Feb. 14, 2008 tragedy, in which five students were killed, may never really be known. The shooter, Steven Kazmierczak of Elk Grove Village, left behind no notes, letters, videos or manifestos explaining his actions.
An independent psychologist hired by NIU police says the shooter may have done it because the university replaced his disliked family, and disruptions in that beloved surrogate family launched the mentally unstable man into an angry downward spiral.
That, and several other factors, may have led the shooter, a 2006 graduate, to enter a large lecture hall and shoot people with a shotgun and a 9 mm handgun. Killed were Daniel Parmenter of Elmhurst, Gayle Dubowski of Carol Stream, Catalina Garcia of Cicero, Julianna Gehant of Mendota and Ryanne Mace of Carpentersville. He shot 16 others, before shooting himself to death, in fewer than 6 minutes.
There wasn't much NIU could have done to prevent the shooting, the report concludes. Under the "Major Findings" portion, it notes "the student had a history of poor mental health" before attending NIU, but that the university is prevented by federal anti-discrimination laws from asking about mental health when considering students for admission.
Teachers and relatives from his past were interviewed for the report. He had behavioral and learning trouble in grade school; his parents asked for an assessment, but were refused. He and his mother would spend afternoons watching gory, age-inappropriate horror movies. When police notified his sister about the shooting, she said she was "surprised he hadn't come to kill her," and that he had once chased her with a knife.
The report says the shooter was diagnosed throughout his teenage years with mental illnesses including schizo-affective disorder and schizoid personality traits. He was anxious and depressed, and heard imaginary voices telling him he was inadequate. He tried to kill himself seven times in a little more than a year, and was kicked out of a group home for fooling staff into thinking he was taking his medications.
After graduating from high school, he worked retail and fast-food jobs, and was fired from four of them. He joined the Army, where he apparently did well, until Army officials discovered he had lied about his mental-health treatments on enlistment documents and discharged him.
He graduated from NIU with honors in 2006. The report mentions he developed an especially close relationship with a professor in the sociology department, and speculates the shooter may have found a kind of surrogate loving and accepting family in this. He was trusted enough to help teach courses as an undergraduate, and began graduate studies there. But changes in the department, including a new chairman, made him unhappy, and he transferred to the University of Illinois.
In 2006 his mother, from whom he had been estranged, died. During a November 2007 visit, his father told him his mother didn't love him because of the disruptions to family life his behavior caused, and handed over all the shooter's psychiatric records.
In the weeks leading up to the shooting, the gunman stopped taking medication prescribed by a psychiatrist, started stockpiling weapons and began covering his body in bizarre tattoos.
The report contends there were no warning signs that he was planning his attack. He had no contact with university or local police, or other judicial agencies, that would have indicated problems. As a teenager, he was detained by police, once for planting a Drano bomb on a neighbor's porch and once for rooting through a business' trash container. He was never charged with wrongdoing.
Since the shooting, NIU has trained staff members in how to identify and assess threats to safety from people with suspected mental-health problems, and adopted a policy that allows it to remove students from school until the matter is settled satisfactorily.
"But even at that, the NIU shooter would not have popped up, because he was a model student," NIU President John Peters said.
"My view is, the country has not made appropriate investments in mental-health care," Peters said. But then, the privacy rights of people with mental illnesses have to be balanced with overall society's need for safety, he said. "I think we need a national debate on that."
"While (the shooter's) motive may never be fully understood, these experts (FBI and private psychologists) believe that (his) decision to stop taking medicines for mental illness, in some measure, led to his criminal actions. He acted in a deliberate and premeditated fashion with malice of forethought (sic) to inflict maximum death and carnage on innocent victims," the report states.
"We realize this report brings neither comfort nor closure, but by sharing what we learned while dealing with this tragedy, we add information to the body of research on mass shootings that seem to increasingly plague our society," Peters wrote in the report.
The report is available at niu.edu/feb14report/.